> Because we do want location and its block to be tightly coupled. I may
> want to add an assertion that if location is known, the block should
> *not* be NULL.
Yes, that would be a first step towards always continuing. But that's 4.9
material, let's install the posted patch as-is for 4.8.
--
> OK, thanks. What happens if you go one step farther and always continue?
Because we do want location and its block to be tightly coupled. I may
want to add an assertion that if location is known, the block should
*not* be NULL.
Dehao
>
> --
> Eric Botcazou
> As Richard suggested, if a location is UNKNOWN_LOCATION, instead of
> change_scope to DECL_INITIAL (cfun->decl), we should let it inherit
> location from its previous instructions. This is implemented in the
> attached patch.
>
> Bootstrapped and passed gcc regression tests and gdb regression te
Hi,
As Richard suggested, if a location is UNKNOWN_LOCATION, instead of
change_scope to DECL_INITIAL (cfun->decl), we should let it inherit
location from its previous instructions. This is implemented in the
attached patch.
Bootstrapped and passed gcc regression tests and gdb regression tests.
I
