On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> AIX added support for the initially missing DWARF sections.
>> Bad news: The support is in an AIX service pack whose presence on a
>> system requires effort to determine.
>
> So, we faced t
On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> AIX added support for the initially missing DWARF sections.
> Bad news: The support is in an AIX service pack whose presence on a
> system requires effort to determine.
So, we faced this problem at Apple, and we just required that people apply
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> If the assembler and linker generate errors, it further
>> delays deployment in GCC.
>
> If the assembler generates errors, then surely it's easy to error out at
> configure time, printing a note about the service pack.
>
> So, assuming
On 09/24/2015 12:02 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> If the assembler and linker pass the sections with the additional numbers
> through and older DBX doesn't know about the sections, it doesn't matter.
Agreed. In that case we simply emit the data all the time and let capable
debuggers pick it up.
>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 11:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Good news: AIX added support for the initially missing DWARF sections.
>
> Yay!
>
>> Bad news: The support is in an AIX service pack whose presence on a
>> system requires effort to determi
On 09/24/2015 11:40 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Good news: AIX added support for the initially missing DWARF sections.
Yay!
> Bad news: The support is in an AIX service pack whose presence on a
> system requires effort to determine.
Boo!
Well, we've had worse problems with Solaris in the past.
>> + else if (TARGET_XCOFF && GET_CODE (x) == SYMBOL_REF
>> + && SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) != 0)
>> +{
>> + if (SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) == TLS_MODEL_LOCAL_EXEC)
>> + fputs ("@le", file);
>> + else if (SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) == TLS_MODEL_INITIAL_EXEC)
>> + fputs
On 09/23/2015 07:39 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Richard and Richard,
>
> Appended is the updated version of the DWARF support patch for AIX. I
> still can split out the length computation into a separate helper
> function, but, as I mentioned, it won't apply to the instance that
> uses a delta of
Richard and Richard,
Appended is the updated version of the DWARF support patch for AIX. I
still can split out the length computation into a separate helper
function, but, as I mentioned, it won't apply to the instance that
uses a delta of two labels.
This version sets have_macinfo to False and
