On 12/12/2012 06:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>> Probably not suitable for trunk because I use popen/pclose/fileno
>> which I don't know whether they are available on all host platforms.
>
> Just add a ifdef HAVE_popen or somesuch around it?
Better yet, use the pex routin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> + fputs ("digraph \"\" { overlap=false;\n", fp);
This is "start_graph_dump (fp);"
> + fputs ("}\n", fp);
And this is "end_graph_dump (fp);"
I think it'd be good to call those functions instead of the fputs
calls. Keeps things consist
Richard Biener writes:
>
> Probably not suitable for trunk because I use popen/pclose/fileno
> which I don't know whether they are available on all host platforms.
Just add a ifdef HAVE_popen or somesuch around it?
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:11:26PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> There are several warts that need addressing for GCC 4.9. I'm aware of
> the following bugs. There may be others, if you find any please let me
> know.
Ok, in case I find something, I'll let you know.
> 1. dumping for debug_dot_c
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Well, it now uses dominators - so steven, I suppose "fancy" dumping
> > should be disabled whenever they are not already computed?
>
> Uh, it does? I tried to avoid that (I used get_loop_body_
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Well, it now uses dominators - so steven, I suppose "fancy" dumping
> should be disabled whenever they are not already computed?
Uh, it does? I tried to avoid that (I used get_loop_body_in_bfs_order
for this reason). Do you have a test case
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
>> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
>> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change ne
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> > gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> > function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed to the now very
> good dumping code is splitting out t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed to the now very
> good dumping code is splitting out the actual
This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed to the now very
good dumping code is splitting out the actual worker without
the FILE handling.
Probably not suitable for tru
11 matches
Mail list logo
