On Wed, 18 May 2016, Jeff Law wrote:
> FWIW, Fedora 24 uses dejagnu-1.6. Not sure about other distributions.
openSUSE Tumbleweed is on 1.5.3, but I'm pretty sure we can get
that updated. FreeBSD Ports are at 1.6.
IMHO, go ahead.
Gerald
On May 18, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 05/02/2016 10:24 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:29:50AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 04/29/2016 05:56 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
...
Maybe a comment should be added to the test case
/* If this test is *r
On 05/02/2016 10:24 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:29:50AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/29/2016 05:56 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
...
Maybe a comment should be added to the test case
/* If this test is *run* (not just compiled) and therefore fails
on non sh*-targets, this
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 09:29:50AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/29/2016 05:56 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > ...
> >Maybe a comment should be added to the test case
> >
> > /* If this test is *run* (not just compiled) and therefore fails
> > on non sh*-targets, this is because of a bug older De
On 04/29/2016 05:56 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Yeah, sorry, I really should have mentioned this but forgot about
it. It's a bug in DejaGnu. When it encounters a conditional
dg-do and the condition does not match, it *still* replaces the
do-action of a prior dg-do with the current one. With DejaG
Hi,
nice bug, we should not test it in the gcc testsuite.
Could you just split the spec-options.c test case in one that
compiles everywhere, and one that executes only on target sh*-*-* ?
Bernd.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:03:40PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Dominik Vogt writes:
>
> > The attached patch cleans up some (mostly unnecessary) dg-do
> > directives in the gcc.dg and gcc.target test cases.
>
> This part
>
> * gcc.dg/spec-options.c: Switch order of the two "dg-do run" so
Dominik Vogt writes:
> The attached patch cleans up some (mostly unnecessary) dg-do
> directives in the gcc.dg and gcc.target test cases.
This part
* gcc.dg/spec-options.c: Switch order of the two "dg-do run" so that
the test ist actually "run" on sh*-*-*. Order _does_ matter.
On 04/27/2016 09:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The attached patch cleans up some (mostly unnecessary) dg-do
> directives in the gcc.dg and gcc.target test cases.
Applied. Thanks!
-Andreas-
On 04/27/2016 09:50 AM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
The attached patch cleans up some (mostly unnecessary) dg-do
directives in the gcc.dg and gcc.target test cases.
Ok except...
* gcc.dg/spec-options.c: Switch order of the two "dg-do run" so that
the test ist actually "run" on sh*-*-*
Vogt
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 15:42:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Clean up tests where a later dg-do completely overrides
another.
In most tests the first dg-do could be simply removed. In one case the two
lines needed to be swapped so that the condition of the "run" was not
overridden by
11 matches
Mail list logo