> > I am giving the patch brief benchmarking on profiledbootstrap and it it
> > won't
> > cause major regression, I think we should go ahead with the patch.
Uhm, I profiledbootstrapped and we bit too fast to get resonable oprofile.
What I get is:
7443 9.4372 lto1 lto1
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
>> >> + badness = ((int)((double) edge->count / max_count
>> >> + * relbenefit / RELAT
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
> >> + badness = ((int)((double) edge->count / max_count
> >> + * relbenefit / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE * INT_MIN / 2)) /
> >> growth
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
>> + badness = ((int)((double) edge->count / max_count
>> + * relbenefit / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE * INT_MIN / 2)) / growth;
>> +
>> >>>
>>
> >>
> >> I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
> + badness = ((int)((double) edge->count / max_count
> + * relbenefit / RELATIVE_TIME_BENEFIT_RANGE * INT_MIN / 2)) / growth;
> +
> >>>
> >>> FP operations on the host are frowned upon if code gene
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> The original patch has some flaw. The new patch is attached.
> Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>> Hi, Richard,
>>
>> I've updated the pa
Hi, Richard,
Could you take a second look at this patch?
Thanks,
Dehao
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> The original patch has some flaw. The new patch is attached.
> Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Dehao Che
The original patch has some flaw. The new patch is attached.
Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
Thanks,
Dehao
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> Hi, Richard,
>
> I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> On Mon, Jun 24,
Hi, Richard,
I've updated the patch (as attached) to use sreal to compute badness.
Thanks,
Dehao
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:41 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
>> This patch prevents integer-underflow of badness computation in ipa-inline.
>>
>> Boot
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Dehao Chen wrote:
> This patch prevents integer-underflow of badness computation in ipa-inline.
>
> Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Dehao
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 2013-06-21 Dehao Chen
>
> * ipa-inline.c (edge_badnes
This patch prevents integer-underflow of badness computation in ipa-inline.
Bootstrapped and passed regression tests.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Dehao
gcc/ChangeLog:
2013-06-21 Dehao Chen
* ipa-inline.c (edge_badness): Fix integer underflow.
Index: gcc/ipa-inline.c
=
11 matches
Mail list logo
