Re: [PATCH] Change gcc_release for 5+

2015-04-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:44:12AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > @@ -130,8 +130,20 @@ EOF > > > > > > # Update gcc/DEV-PHASE. > > > > > > -[ `cat ${SOURCE_DIRECTORY}/gcc/BASE-VER` = ${RELEASE} ] || \ > > > -error "Release number ${R

Re: [PATCH] Change gcc_release for 5+

2015-04-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 09:44:12AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > @@ -130,8 +130,20 @@ EOF > > > > # Update gcc/DEV-PHASE. > > > > -[ `cat ${SOURCE_DIRECTORY}/gcc/BASE-VER` = ${RELEASE} ] || \ > > -error "Release number ${RELEASE} does not match BASE-VER" > > +if [ `cat ${SOU

Re: [PATCH] Change gcc_release for 5+

2015-04-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > Here is an attempt to adjust gcc_release for 5+ versioning scheme. > The second hunk hopefully will use the right branch version, the first hunk > (to be tested when -f will be invoked) should bump automatically BASE-VER > (e.g. from 5.0.1 to 5.

[PATCH] Change gcc_release for 5+

2015-04-12 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Hi! Here is an attempt to adjust gcc_release for 5+ versioning scheme. The second hunk hopefully will use the right branch version, the first hunk (to be tested when -f will be invoked) should bump automatically BASE-VER (e.g. from 5.0.1 to 5.1.0). I'd think we should perhaps also change all the