On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:35:33 +0100
Richard Biener wrote:
> > I'm sure you agree we don't want to let this tail wag the dog.
> > With my exegesis in mind, what would you recommend? If it's
> > limited to more judicious use of makefile variables, I could surely
> > implement those suggestions.
>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 6:50 PM James K. Lowden
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:24:52 +
> Sam James wrote:
>
> > > +prototypes.cpp: posix.txt
> > > + awk -F'[/.]' '{ print $$6 }' $^ | \
> > > + while read F; do echo "/* $$F */" && man 2 $$F | \
> > > + ./scrape.awk -v
"James K. Lowden" writes:
> On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:24:52 +
> Sam James wrote:
>
>> > +prototypes.cpp: posix.txt
>> > + awk -F'[/.]' '{ print $$6 }' $^ | \
>> > + while read F; do echo "/* $$F */" && man 2 $$F | \
>> > + ./scrape.awk -v funcname=$$6; done > $@~
>> > + @mv
On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:24:52 +
Sam James wrote:
> > +prototypes.cpp: posix.txt
> > + awk -F'[/.]' '{ print $$6 }' $^ | \
> > + while read F; do echo "/* $$F */" && man 2 $$F | \
> > + ./scrape.awk -v funcname=$$6; done > $@~
> > + @mv $@~ $@
> > +
> > +posix.txt:
> > +
"James K. Lowden" writes:
> From 5d53920602e234e4d99ae2d502e662ee3699978e 4 Oct 2024 12:01:22 -0400
> From: "James K. Lowden"
> Date: Sat 15 Feb 2025 12:50:54 PM EST
> Subject: [PATCH] 12 new 'cobol' FE files
Please make sure the commit summaries reflect the contents.
>
> gcc/cobol/ChangeLog
>
>From 5d53920602e234e4d99ae2d502e662ee3699978e 4 Oct 2024 12:01:22 -0400
From: "James K. Lowden"
Date: Sat 15 Feb 2025 12:50:54 PM EST
Subject: [PATCH] 12 new 'cobol' FE files
gcc/cobol/ChangeLog
* posix/.gitignore: New file.
* posix/Makefile: New file.
* posix/README.md:
