On 3/8/21 4:33 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/21 9:54 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/4/21 10:52 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/21 4:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Sure, I guess you do need to set that flag for the local decls, but
that should be all.
Jason
Doing that also fails :/
This time
On 3/4/21 9:54 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/4/21 10:52 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/21 4:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Sure, I guess you do need to set that flag for the local decls, but that should
be all.
Jason
Doing that also fails :/
This time likely due to how we set RECORD argument
On 3/4/21 10:52 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/21 4:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Sure, I guess you do need to set that flag for the local decls, but
that should be all.
Jason
Doing that also fails :/
This time likely due to how we set RECORD argument of
maybe_version_functions function:
On 3/4/21 4:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Sure, I guess you do need to set that flag for the local decls, but that should
be all.
Jason
Doing that also fails :/
This time likely due to how we set RECORD argument of maybe_version_functions
function:
gcc/cp/decl.c:&& maybe_version_function
On 3/4/21 10:39 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/4/21 4:03 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Do you really need to register all these pairs? I was expecting that
you'd just look through DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS and then register the
pair you end up with. Local decls shouldn't need a cgraph node.
Well, doin
On 3/4/21 4:03 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Do you really need to register all these pairs? I was expecting that you'd
just look through DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS and then register the pair you end up
with. Local decls shouldn't need a cgraph node.
Well, doing that:
commit 662c486edafa467ec41091e
On 3/4/21 3:19 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/2/21 6:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/2/21 5:34 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 8:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 11:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:
On 3/2/21 6:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/2/21 5:34 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 8:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 11:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem
On 3/2/21 5:34 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 8:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 11:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local de
On 3/1/21 8:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 11:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local decls. If
DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P, you need t
On 3/1/21 11:59 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local decls. If
DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P, you need to look at DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS to find
t
On 3/1/21 5:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local decls. If
DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P, you need to look at DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS to find the
namespace-scope decl. But then if th
On 3/1/21 7:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local decls. If
DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P, you need to look at DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS to find
the namespace-scope decl. But then if there is no preceding
namespace-scope decla
On 2/22/21 11:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
The problem seems to be with the handling of local decls. If
DECL_LOCAL_DECL_P, you need to look at DECL_LOCAL_DECL_ALIAS to find the
namespace-scope decl. But then if there is no preceding namespace-scope
declaration, the new decl created by push_lo
On 2/18/21 7:15 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
We crash when target attribute get_function_versions_dispatcher is called
for a function that is not registered in call graph. This fixes that
by emitting a new error.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be inst
We crash when target attribute get_function_versions_dispatcher is called
for a function that is not registered in call graph. This fixes that
by emitting a new error.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
16 matches
Mail list logo
