I still don't see anything wrong with the patch. Tested by boostrapping gcc.
The difference between the original patch (that got reverted without
any comment) and the one that was later applied to trunk is that the
original patch did
AC_SUBST(glibcxx_thread_h)
and the new one (that is currently
This is the original thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-10/msg00525.html
This exact patch was never reverted. It seems to be a second attempt,
that was only applied to trunk that time. I'm cc-ing the original
author.
Smaller patch attached.
* config/gthr.m4: New. Define G
On 05/14/2013 03:24 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I'd like to know what problem it solves and why it was reverted before
making that change on a stable release branch.
Indeed.
And please always post a clear ChangeLog and don't post regenerated
files, which are normally big and only add to the co
On 14 May 2013 14:14, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch merges r192458 into gcc-4_7 to fix separate configure/build
> of libstdc++.
>
> A bit of history: a similar patch was committed to trunk & 4.7 back in
> Oct'12, then reverted from both, than this patch was committed to
> trunk only.
Hi,
this patch merges r192458 into gcc-4_7 to fix separate configure/build
of libstdc++.
A bit of history: a similar patch was committed to trunk & 4.7 back in
Oct'12, then reverted from both, than this patch was committed to
trunk only. I wonder if it was simply lost for some reason?
Is it OK f
