Re: [PATCH] Avoid regressing with the PR48248 change

2011-04-21 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Richard Guenther wrote: > This avoids changing -P output with the PR48248 fix which appearantly > breaks Chrome (with has bogus assumptions on gcc -E -P output). > > For 4.7 I think we should instead go with the 2nd patch and make -P > output smaller (which is the whole reaso

[PATCH] Avoid regressing with the PR48248 change

2011-04-18 Thread Richard Guenther
This avoids changing -P output with the PR48248 fix which appearantly breaks Chrome (with has bogus assumptions on gcc -E -P output). For 4.7 I think we should instead go with the 2nd patch and make -P output smaller (which is the whole reason for this code path). Thus, first patch is for the 4.