On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 19:17 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On December 7, 2015 6:21:36 PM GMT+01:00, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> >Hi Richi,
> >
> >I was afraid this would break X86. Unfortunately, your proposed patch
> >didn't change any output for me. Still seeing 6 and 8 instances of
> >"pattern
On December 7, 2015 6:21:36 PM GMT+01:00, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
>Hi Richi,
>
>I was afraid this would break X86. Unfortunately, your proposed patch
>didn't change any output for me. Still seeing 6 and 8 instances of
>"pattern recognized", unfortunately.
Hmm, can you open a PR and attach vectori
Hi Richi,
I was afraid this would break X86. Unfortunately, your proposed patch
didn't change any output for me. Still seeing 6 and 8 instances of
"pattern recognized", unfortunately.
Bill
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 11:50 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Bill Schmidt
>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> Since r226675, we have been seeing these failures:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-s16.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
> scan-tree-dump-times vect "pattern recognized" 2
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-s16.c scan-tree-dump-times
Since r226675, we have been seeing these failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-s16.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
scan-tree-dump-times vect "pattern recognized" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult-const-s16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
"pattern recognized" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-widen-mult
