On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:06 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:20 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:34 PM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:03 AM liuhongt via Gcc-patches <
> > > gcc-pa
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:20 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:34 PM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:03 AM liuhongt via Gcc-patches <
> > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > updated patch:
> > > 1. Add documents
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:34 PM Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:03 AM liuhongt via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > updated patch:
> > 1. Add documents in doc/sourcebuild.texi (Effective-Target Keywords).
> > 2. Reduce -novec
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 11:03 AM liuhongt via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> updated patch:
> 1. Add documents in doc/sourcebuild.texi (Effective-Target Keywords).
> 2. Reduce -novec.c testcases to contain only new failed parted which
> is caused by O2 vectorization.
>
updated patch:
1. Add documents in doc/sourcebuild.texi (Effective-Target Keywords).
2. Reduce -novec.c testcases to contain only new failed parted which
is caused by O2 vectorization.
3. Add PR in dg-warning comment.
As discussed in [1], this patch add xfail/target selector to those
testcas
On 10/17/21 10:38 PM, Hongtao Liu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 10/14/21 1:11 AM, liuhongt wrote:
Hi Kewen:
Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
for rs6000 port.
As discussed in [1], this patch add xfail/target selector to those
te
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 3:11 PM Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> on 2021/10/14 下午6:56, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hi Hongtao,
> >
> > on 2021/10/14 下午3:11, liuhongt wrote:
> >> Hi Kewen:
> >> Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
> >> for rs6000 port.
> >>
>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 10/14/21 1:11 AM, liuhongt wrote:
> > Hi Kewen:
> >Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
> > for rs6000 port.
> >
> > As discussed in [1], this patch add xfail/target selector to those
> > testcases, also make a
On 10/14/21 1:11 AM, liuhongt wrote:
Hi Kewen:
Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
for rs6000 port.
As discussed in [1], this patch add xfail/target selector to those
testcases, also make a copy of them so that they can be tested w/o
vectorization.
Just to make sure
on 2021/10/14 下午6:56, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hi Hongtao,
>
> on 2021/10/14 下午3:11, liuhongt wrote:
>> Hi Kewen:
>> Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
>> for rs6000 port.
>>
>
> The ppc64le run just finished, there are still some regresssions:
>
> NA->XPASS
Hi Hongtao,
on 2021/10/14 下午3:11, liuhongt wrote:
> Hi Kewen:
> Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
> for rs6000 port.
>
The ppc64le run just finished, there are still some regresssions:
NA->XPASS: c-c++-common/Wstringop-overflow-2.c -Wc++-compat (test for
warning
On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 15:11:41 +0800
liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> * lib/target-supports.exp (check_vect_slp_vnqihi_store_usage):
> New function.
> (check_effective_target_vect_slp_v2qi_store): Ditto.
> (check_effective_target_vect_slp_v4qi_store): Ditto.
> (check_
Hi Kewen:
Cound you help to verify if this patch fix those regressions
for rs6000 port.
As discussed in [1], this patch add xfail/target selector to those
testcases, also make a copy of them so that they can be tested w/o
vectorization.
Newly added xfail/target selectors are used to check the v
As discussed in PR.
It looks like it's just the the location of the warning that's off,
the warning itself is still issued but it's swallowed by the
dg-prune-output directive.
Since the test was added to verify the fix for an ICE without
vectorization I think disabling vectorization should be fine
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 10:19 PM liuhongt wrote:
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> PR middle-end/102669
> * gnat.dg/unroll1.adb: Add -fno-tree-vectorize.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/unroll1.adb | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR middle-end/102669
* gnat.dg/unroll1.adb: Add -fno-tree-vectorize.
---
gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/unroll1.adb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/unroll1.adb
b/gcc/testsuite/gnat.dg/unroll1.adb
index 34d8
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:23 AM Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Hongtao,
>
> on 2021/10/11 上午10:10, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > libgomp/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c: Add
> > -fno-tree-vectorize.
> > ---
> > libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.gr
Hi Hongtao,
on 2021/10/11 上午10:10, liuhongt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> libgomp/ChangeLog:
>
> * testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c: Add
> -fno-tree-vectorize.
> ---
> libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
libgomp/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c: Add
-fno-tree-vectorize.
---
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-8.c
b/libgomp/test
19 matches
Mail list logo
