On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Similarly to the V{4,8}SFmode -> unsigned V{4,8}SImode conversion
>> > support for AVX this one adds V{2,4}DFmode -> unsigned V{4,8}SImode
>> > conversion.
>> >
>> > Ok for trunk?
>>
>> Please put expander function into i386.c. IMO, this e
On 11/01/2011 06:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> ... disadvantage is that the stmts in the new
> pattern are now in vcmppd; vandpd; vaddpd; vcmppd; vandpd; vaddpd order
> instead of vcmppd; vcmppd; vandpd; vandpd; vaddpd; vaddpd; (not sure why
> the scheduler didn't change it, but on the other side i
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 11:16:07AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Similarly to the V{4,8}SFmode -> unsigned V{4,8}SImode conversion
> > support for AVX this one adds V{2,4}DFmode -> unsigned V{4,8}SImode
> > conversion.
> >
> > Ok for trunk
