On 04/02/21 21:20 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
Considering that most of the code is already new code it doesn't
look like a major tradeoff duplicate some more code.
So here is a new proposal with only new code. However I left the
new few XXX_tr methods accessible even in C++11 because
Considering that most of the code is already new code it doesn't
look like a major tradeoff duplicate some more code.
So here is a new proposal with only new code. However I left the
new few XXX_tr methods accessible even in C++11 because I'll use them to
propose a fix for PR 98066 whe
On 03/02/21 11:23 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/01/21 19:21 +0100, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
I think I never got a clear answer that we'll wait for stage 1 to
consider this patch so here is a ping.
My concern with this patch is that it alters the existing code used
for non-het
On 25/01/21 19:21 +0100, François Dumont via Libstdc++ wrote:
I think I never got a clear answer that we'll wait for stage 1 to
consider this patch so here is a ping.
My concern with this patch is that it alters the existing code used
for non-heterogeneous lookups in C++11/14/17. I think if we'
I think I never got a clear answer that we'll wait for stage 1 to
consider this patch so here is a ping.
On 01/12/20 8:19 am, François Dumont wrote:
Let me know if I need to reference a specific paper or any other
Standard reference here. Maybe P1690R1 I used here ?
I tried to allow the same
Let me know if I need to reference a specific paper or any other
Standard reference here. Maybe P1690R1 I used here ?
I tried to allow the same partition trick you can have on ordered
containers (see Partition in tests) even if here elements are not
ordered so I aren't sure there can be any us
