Pushed to master.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/97510
* gcc.target/i386/pr97510.c: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97510.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr97510.c
diff --git a/gcc/t
On 03/14/2018 11:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a new test-case isolated from libreoffice.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
> I'm going to install it.
>
> Martin
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> 2018-03-14 Martin Liska
>
> P
> Sorry for the breakage. Actually I did testing on x86_64 and ppcl64
> machines.
There is no breakage, just an issue with the ordering of warnings which may
vary across platforms.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 03/14/2018 09:12 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Please make sure to test it on more platforms (see PR ipa/83983 for details).
>
Sorry for the breakage. Actually I did testing on x86_64 and ppcl64 machines.
Martin
On 14 March 2018 at 21:12, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Please make sure to test it on more platforms (see PR ipa/83983 for details).
>
Hi,
These new tests do not work well on arm-none-eabi and aarch64-none-elf.
(as oppose
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Please make sure to test it on more platforms (see PR ipa/83983 for details).
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi.
This is a new test-case isolated from libreoffice.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
I'm going to install it.
Martin
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-03-14 Martin Liska
PR ipa/8480
* g++.dg/lto/pr84805_0.C: New test.
* g++.d
On 04/20/2017 11:31 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:04 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> The patch adds a new test-case for the mentioned PR. Tested on
>>> x86_64-linux-gnu
>>> and ppc64le-linux-gnu.
>>>
>>> Ready for
On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:04 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> The patch adds a new test-case for the mentioned PR. Tested on
>> x86_64-linux-gnu
>> and ppc64le-linux-gnu.
>>
>> Ready for trunk or should I postpone it for next stage1?
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The patch adds a new test-case for the mentioned PR. Tested on
> x86_64-linux-gnu
> and ppc64le-linux-gnu.
>
> Ready for trunk or should I postpone it for next stage1?
Though can't approve, I think it's ok since we are in stage 1 n
:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add test-case (PR tree-optimization/66278).
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-04-20 Martin Liska
PR tree-optimization/66278
* gcc.dg/vect/pr66278.c: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr66278.c | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
create m
For the original microblaze, it will report error with "-O0" (and other
flags are all OK).
gcc/testsuite/:
2014-09-28 Chen Gang
* gcc.c-torture/compile/calls-void.c: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/calls-void.c | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 inser
12 matches
Mail list logo