Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:25:23AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > I thought complex(kind=16) is normal double _Complex, isn't it? > > No, that would be complex(kind=8). Ah, I've mixed that with complex*16, which apparently is the same thing as complex(kind=8). Fixed

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-07 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jakub Jelinek writes: > I thought complex(kind=16) is normal double _Complex, isn't it? No, that would be complex(kind=8). Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 10:11:06AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/udr6.f90.jj 2014-06-02 > > 10:49:02.674337338 +0200 > > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/udr6.f90 2014-06-02 15:40:52.664740529 > > +0200 > > @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-07 Thread Andreas Schwab
Jakub Jelinek writes: > --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/udr6.f90.jj2014-06-02 > 10:49:02.674337338 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/udr6.f90 2014-06-02 15:40:52.664740529 > +0200 > @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ > +! { dg-do compile } > +! { dg-options "-fmax-errors=1000 -fopenmp -ffr

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-05 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:42:39AM +0200, FX wrote: > > As discussed with Tobias on IRC yesterday, the fact that I'd like to > > eventually backport the Fortran OpenMP 4.0 support to 4.9 branch > > poses a problem with the module.c changes > > But this is by design, because we’re not supposed to a

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-03 Thread FX
> As discussed with Tobias on IRC yesterday, the fact that I'd like to > eventually backport the Fortran OpenMP 4.0 support to 4.9 branch > poses a problem with the module.c changes But this is by design, because we’re not supposed to add new features (especially API-changing or module-changing o

Re: [PATCH] Add support for OpenMP fortran user defined reductions

2014-06-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:11:20PM +0200, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > First I should say many thanks for this support for gfortran. This is > the one area for which we have professional support and I for one am > truly grateful. > > I have scanned through the patch and can see nothing to object t