On Fri, 2017-12-29 at 15:39 +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 06:20 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Martin: I noticed that your switch expansion patch added a
> > vec::reverse ()
> > method. Here's a proposed selftest for it, mostly to verify
> > that it handles even vs odd lengths (which
On 10/06/2017 06:20 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Martin: I noticed that your switch expansion patch added a
> vec::reverse ()
> method. Here's a proposed selftest for it, mostly to verify
> that it handles even vs odd lengths (which it does).
>
> Only lightly tested; hope this is useful.
> Dave
Martin: I noticed that your switch expansion patch added a
vec::reverse ()
method. Here's a proposed selftest for it, mostly to verify
that it handles even vs odd lengths (which it does).
Only lightly tested; hope this is useful.
Dave
gcc/ChangeLog:
* vec.c (selftest::test_reverse): Ne
