t; From: Martin Liska
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:19:21 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Add outline-atomics to target attribute.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2020-05-21 Martin Liska
>
> * common/config/aarch64/aarch64-common.c (aarch64_handle_option):
>
ter. Is it also fine for all
active branches where you backported the atomics outlining?
Martin
>From 357a86fbf18ad511a72e6e9c703a6e0b0dd30ddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Martin Liska
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 09:19:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add outline-atomics to target attribute.
gcc/ChangeL
Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:03:37AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 5/21/20 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Can't it be __attribute__((target ("outline-atomics"))) instead?
>>
>> Ah sorry, I wan unclear.
>> It's support the this _target_ attribute which
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:03:37AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 5/21/20 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Can't it be __attribute__((target ("outline-atomics"))) instead?
>
> Ah sorry, I wan unclear.
> It's support the this _target_ attribute which you mentioned.
Ok, better, will defer review
On 5/21/20 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Can't it be __attribute__((target ("outline-atomics"))) instead?
Ah sorry, I wan unclear.
It's support the this _target_ attribute which you mentioned.
Martin
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:23:47AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> As mentioned in the ovmf project [1], they would like to have a control
> over the -mno-outline-atomics via a function attribute. They struggle
> with configure detection and this can help them to disable the outlining.
>
> Would it b
Hi.
As mentioned in the ovmf project [1], they would like to have a control
over the -mno-outline-atomics via a function attribute. They struggle
with configure detection and this can help them to disable the outlining.
Would it be possible to add the attribute?
Thanks,
Martin
[1] https://bugzi
