Re: [PATCH] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 May 2017, Yuri Gribov wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> As discussed in >> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00455.html , some >> libdl functions rely on return address to figure out the calling >> DSO and then us

Re: [PATCH] Add no_tail_call attribute

Hi, On Mon, 29 May 2017, Yuri Gribov wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed in > https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00455.html , some > libdl functions rely on return address to figure out the calling > DSO and then use this information in computation (e.g. output of dlsym > depends on w

[PATCH] Add no_tail_call attribute

Hi all, As discussed in https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00455.html , some libdl functions rely on return address to figure out the calling DSO and then use this information in computation (e.g. output of dlsym depends on which library called it). As reported in https://gcc.gnu.org