On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 1:59 PM Peter Frost wrote:
>
> Currently the behaviour of Wmissing-field-initializers is inconsistent
> between C and C++. The C warning assumes that missing designated
> initializers are deliberate, and does not warn. The C++ warning does warn
> for missing designated init
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661510.html
Currently the behaviour of Wmissing-field-initializers is inconsistent
between C and C++. The C warning assumes that missing designated
initializers are deliberate, and does not warn. The C++ warning does warn
for missing designated initializers.
This patch changes the behaviour of Wmissing-field
