Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-18 Thread Richard Henderson
On 10/29/2014 04:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > 2014-10-28 Andi Kleen > > PR target/63672 > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_builtin): Generate memory > barrier after abort. > * config/i386/i386.md (xbegin): Add memory barrier. > (xend): Rename to ... > (xend_1)

Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-17 Thread H.J. Lu
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > "H.J. Lu" writes: > >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: Hmm, can't the insns themselves properly clobber/use memory? >>> >>> The transactions don't really use the memory. They just guard it, >>> like a lock. >>> >

Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-17 Thread Andi Kleen
"H.J. Lu" writes: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >>> >>> Hmm, can't the insns themselves properly clobber/use memory? >> >> The transactions don't really use the memory. They just guard it, >> like a lock. >> >> So the intrinsic doesn't know what memory is used inside the

Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-17 Thread H.J. Lu
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> >> Hmm, can't the insns themselves properly clobber/use memory? > > The transactions don't really use the memory. They just guard it, > like a lock. > > So the intrinsic doesn't know what memory is used inside the transaction, > but the access

Re: [PING^2] Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-17 Thread Andi Kleen
Andi Kleen writes: Ping^2! > Andi Kleen writes: > > Ping! > >> From: Andi Kleen >> >> xbegin/xend/xabort were missing memory barriers. This can >> lead to memory operations being moved out of transactions, which would >> cause unexpected races. >> >> Always generate implicit memory barriers fo

[PING] Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-11-10 Thread Andi Kleen
Andi Kleen writes: Ping! > From: Andi Kleen > > xbegin/xend/xabort were missing memory barriers. This can > lead to memory operations being moved out of transactions, which would > cause unexpected races. > > Always generate implicit memory barriers for these intrinsics. > > The compat header v

Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-10-29 Thread Andi Kleen
> > Hmm, can't the insns themselves properly clobber/use memory? The transactions don't really use the memory. They just guard it, like a lock. So the intrinsic doesn't know what memory is used inside the transaction, but the accesses still cannot be moved out. I think a barrier is the only sen

Re: [PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-10-29 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > From: Andi Kleen > > xbegin/xend/xabort were missing memory barriers. This can > lead to memory operations being moved out of transactions, which would > cause unexpected races. > > Always generate implicit memory barriers for these intrinsics.

[PATCH] Add memory barriers to xbegin/xend/xabort

2014-10-28 Thread Andi Kleen
From: Andi Kleen xbegin/xend/xabort were missing memory barriers. This can lead to memory operations being moved out of transactions, which would cause unexpected races. Always generate implicit memory barriers for these intrinsics. The compat header versions always generated memory barriers, s