On 25/07/18 21:23 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/07/18 12:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/07/18 22:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is missing the synchronized_pool_resource and
unsynchronized_pool_resource classes but is otherwise complete.
This is a new implementation, not b
On 25/07/18 12:01 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/07/18 22:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is missing the synchronized_pool_resource and
unsynchronized_pool_resource classes but is otherwise complete.
This is a new implementation, not based on the existing code in
, but memory_resourc
On 24/07/18 22:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This is missing the synchronized_pool_resource and
unsynchronized_pool_resource classes but is otherwise complete.
This is a new implementation, not based on the existing code in
, but memory_resource and
polymorphic_allocator ended up looking almo
This is missing the synchronized_pool_resource and
unsynchronized_pool_resource classes but is otherwise complete.
This is a new implementation, not based on the existing code in
, but memory_resource and
polymorphic_allocator ended up looking almost the same anyway.
The constant_init kluge in s
