n 11/6/21 16:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Martin, pinskia, do you have opinions here?
Hello.
I do prefer having the 4 counters as introduced:
DEBUG_COUNTER (back_thread1)
DEBUG_COUNTER (back_thread2)
DEBUG_COUNTER (back_threadfull1)
DEBUG_COUNTER (back_threadfull2)
Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 3:13 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:27 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/1
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:36 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:27 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/1/2021 3:54 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > > Chasing down stage3 miscomparison
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:27 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/2021 3:54 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > > Chasing down stage3 miscomparisons is never fun, and having no way to
> > > distinguish between jump threads
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/1/2021 3:54 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > Chasing down stage3 miscomparisons is never fun, and having no way to
> > distinguish between jump threads registered by a particular
> > pass, is even harder. This patch adds de
On 11/1/2021 3:54 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Chasing down stage3 miscomparisons is never fun, and having no way to
distinguish between jump threads registered by a particular
pass, is even harder. This patch adds debug counters for the individual
back threading passes. I've left the ethread p
Chasing down stage3 miscomparisons is never fun, and having no way to
distinguish between jump threads registered by a particular
pass, is even harder. This patch adds debug counters for the individual
back threading passes. I've left the ethread pass alone, as that one is
usually benign, but we