On 08/07/14 08:58, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
This test in the torture suite fails on -flto because it scans for a
sentinel string inside an asm block that it wants to make sure is not
optimised away. However, with -flto gcc uses slim LTO objects which
contain a binary representation of the s
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This test in the torture suite fails on -flto because it scans for a
> sentinel string inside an asm block that it wants to make sure is not
> optimised away. However, with -flto gcc uses slim LTO objects which contain
> a binary
Hi all,
This test in the torture suite fails on -flto because it scans for a sentinel
string inside an asm block that it wants to make sure is not optimised away.
However, with -flto gcc uses slim LTO objects which contain a binary
representation of the structure of the program rather than out
