On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 7:13 PM Bradley Lucier wrote:
>
> On 8/17/23 3:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > I think it needs a new category, 'inline' is probably the "closest"
> > existing one
> > but that also tends to be noisy. Maybe 'call' would be a good name? We
> > could
> > report things li
On 8/17/23 3:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I think it needs a new category, 'inline' is probably the "closest" existing one
but that also tends to be noisy. Maybe 'call' would be a good name? We could
report things like tail-recursion optimization, tail-calling and sibling calling
optimizations
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:48 AM Bradley Lucier wrote:
>
> First, if this is no longer the appropriate group for this discussion,
> please tell me where to send it.
>
> I've been working to understand all the comments here. From them, I think:
>
> 1. It's OK to have gcc report back to the user w
First, if this is no longer the appropriate group for this discussion,
please tell me where to send it.
I've been working to understand all the comments here. From them, I think:
1. It's OK to have gcc report back to the user whether each particular
call in tail position is optimized when -f
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 08:05 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 9:04 PM Bradley Lucier
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for your comments. I have a few questions.
> >
> > > I don't think this specific case qualifies for -Wdisabled-
> > > optimization.
> > > The diagnostic is for cas
On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 9:04 PM Bradley Lucier wrote:
>
> Thank you for your comments. I have a few questions.
>
> > I don't think this specific case qualifies for -Wdisabled-optimization.
> > The diagnostic is for cases the user can control and was invented
> > for limits we put up for compile-ti
Thank you for your comments. I have a few questions.
I don't think this specific case qualifies for -Wdisabled-optimization.
The diagnostic is for cases the user can control and was invented
for limits we put up for compile-time and memory-usage issues
where there exist --param XYZ to adjust li
On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 11:54 PM David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 02:28 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 23:28, Bradley Lucier via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
>
> Hi Bradley and Prathamesh...
>
> > >
> > > The patch at the end a
On 8/5/23 5:53 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
...but the warning branch uses "warning", which implicitly uses the
input_location global variable. Is the warning reported at the correct
place? It's better to use warning_at and pass it the location at which
the warning should be emitted.
Thanks, I ch
On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 02:28 +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 23:28, Bradley Lucier via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
Hi Bradley and Prathamesh...
> >
> > The patch at the end adds a warning when a tail/sibling call cannot
> > be
> > optimized for various reasons.
On Sun, 6 Aug 2023 at 03:07, Bradley Lucier wrote:
>
> On 8/5/23 4:58 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > I don't have comments on the patch, but a new warning will also
> > require a corresponding entry in doc/invoke.texi.
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> -Wdisabled-optimization is an establish
On 8/5/23 4:58 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
I don't have comments on the patch, but a new warning will also
require a corresponding entry in doc/invoke.texi.
Thank you for your comment.
-Wdisabled-optimization is an established warning, it's just that I'd
like it to apply in another circums
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 23:28, Bradley Lucier via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> The patch at the end adds a warning when a tail/sibling call cannot be
> optimized for various reasons.
>
> I built and tested GCC with and without the patch with configuration
>
> Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure
The patch at the end adds a warning when a tail/sibling call cannot be
optimized for various reasons.
I built and tested GCC with and without the patch with configuration
Configured with: ../../gcc-mainline/configure --enable-languages=c
--disable-multilib --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline --disable
14 matches
Mail list logo
