> Which means that -O0 should also set optimize_debug to 1? -O0 is
> then !optimize && optimize_debug and -Og is optimize == 1 &&
> optimize_debug.
That sounds more confusing than helpful though. Adding (|| optimize_debug) in
the relevant places is probably good enough.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> > cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
>
> This needs an entry in gcc-4.8/ch
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> > cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
> >
> > Discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org at least shows interest in this, so this
> > is a formal patch su
> This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
>
> Discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org at least shows interest in this, so this
> is a formal patch submission with a request for comments on the
> impleme
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
This needs an entry in gcc-4.8/changes.html, of course.
Ian
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> 2012-09-18 Richard Guenther
>
> PR other/53316
> * common.opt (optimize_debug): New variable.
> (Og): New optimization level.
> * doc/invoke.texi (Og): Document.
> * opts.c (maybe_default_option
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:38:27PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Glibc must be compiled with optimization. Will -Og build glibc?
>
> Apply the patch and check for yourself. I suppose the answer will
> be yes (whatever "optimization" requirements glibc has).
glibc headers check __OPTIMIZE__
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> > cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
> >
> > Discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org at least
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
> cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
>
> Discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org at least shows interest in this, so this
> is a formal pa
This adds -Og as optimization level targeted at the devel-compile-debug
cycle (formerly mostly tied to -O0 due to debug issues with even -O1).
Discussion on g...@gcc.gnu.org at least shows interest in this, so this
is a formal patch submission with a request for comments on the
implementation (no
10 matches
Mail list logo
