On 07/25/16 04:42, Martin Liška wrote:
I like the change suggested by Jakub, I've updated the numbering scheme, as well
as comments in gcov-io.h.
ok. I'm not too fussed about a problem that is 25 years away and would result
in contusion of code (then) instrumented 30 years ago.
nathan
as well
as comments in gcov-io.h.
Final version installed as r238702.
Martin
>From 7cdcfec705d90f4d0a04d82617373077280ec495 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:54:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Adapt the numbering scheme (PR gcov-profile/64874)
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-2
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:46:44PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> As described in the PR, current numbering scheme in gcov-io.h would overflow
> in couple of years.
> Thus, I'm suggesting to switch from:
>
> [major][minor/10][minor%10][release_status]
>
> to:
> [major/10][major%10][minor][release_
On 07/22/16 07:46, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
As described in the PR, current numbering scheme in gcov-io.h would overflow in
couple of years.
Thus, I'm suggesting to switch from:
[major][minor/10][minor%10][release_status]
to:
[major/10][major%10][minor][release_status]
If I'm reading that ri
vives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
>From 3e35f8f08558d95f5d6bd674f659c976ea86f311 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: marxin
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:54:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Adapt the numbering scheme (PR gcov-profile/64874)
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-22 Martin Liska
PR gcov
