On 18/06/13 17:22, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping.
On 06/06/2013 01:23 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
On 06/06/2013 08:11 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
I understand (and agree with) this bit...
+(define_peephole2
+ [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
+(compare:CC (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
+
Ping.
On 06/06/2013 01:23 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 08:11 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> I understand (and agree with) this bit...
>>
>>> +(define_peephole2
>>> + [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
>>> +(compare:CC (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
>>> +(match_opera
On 06/06/2013 01:23 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 08:11 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> I understand (and agree with) this bit...
>>
>>> +(define_peephole2
>>> + [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
>>> +(compare:CC (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
>>> +(match_operand:SI
On 06/06/2013 08:11 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I understand (and agree with) this bit...
>
>> +(define_peephole2
>> + [(set (reg:CC CC_REGNUM)
>> +(compare:CC (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "")
>> +(match_operand:SI 1 "arm_rhs_operand" "")))
>> + (cond_exec (ne (reg:
On 29/05/13 18:15, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
This patch fixes a bug in one of the ARM peephole2 optimizations. The
peephole2 optimization in question was changed to use the CC-updating
form for all of the instructions produced by the peephole so that the
encoding will be smaller when compiling
Ping.
On 05/29/2013 12:15 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> This patch fixes a bug in one of the ARM peephole2 optimizations. The
> peephole2 optimization in question was changed to use the CC-updating
> form for all of the instructions produced by the peephole so that the
> encoding will be
Hi All,
This patch fixes a bug in one of the ARM peephole2 optimizations. The
peephole2 optimization in question was changed to use the CC-updating
form for all of the instructions produced by the peephole so that the
encoding will be smaller when compiling for thumb [1]. However, I don't
think
