Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-12-05 Thread David Edelsohn
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On 11/25/2014 02:53 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> >> Now that things have calmed down with respect to breakage on AIX, the >> patch for building libgcc_s is okay. > > FYI: > > libtool-2.4.4 does support "--with-aix-soname=aix|both|svr

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-12-05 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/25/2014 02:53 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > > Now that things have calmed down with respect to breakage on AIX, the > patch for building libgcc_s is okay. FYI: libtool-2.4.4 does support "--with-aix-soname=aix|both|svr4" now too, http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.libtool.patches/11789/

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-25 Thread David Edelsohn
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > > On 11/11/2014 04:02 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> Michael, >> >> Why does the configure change match with p*-*-aix... instead of power* >> or powerpc*? Yes, it's unique and will match, but why make it as >> short as possible, whi

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-11 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 11/11/2014 04:02 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > Michael, > > Why does the configure change match with p*-*-aix... instead of power* > or powerpc*? Yes, it's unique and will match, but why make it as > short as possible, which doesn't match other uses? Actually I did have powerpc* initially, bu

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-11 Thread David Edelsohn
Michael, Why does the configure change match with p*-*-aix... instead of power* or powerpc*? Yes, it's unique and will match, but why make it as short as possible, which doesn't match other uses? In your documentation, how are you distinguishing between Dynamic Linking and Runtime Linking? Than

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-10 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
Am 2014-11-10 17:06, schrieb David Edelsohn: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Michael Haubenwallner > wrote: >> >> Am 2014-11-07 20:52, schrieb David Edelsohn: >>> First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to >>> gcc-patches. >>> >>> I don't have a fundamental objection

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-10 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > Am 2014-11-07 20:52, schrieb David Edelsohn: >> First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to >> gcc-patches. >> >> I don't have a fundamental objection to including this option, but >> note that Richi, Honza a

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-10 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
Am 2014-11-07 20:52, schrieb David Edelsohn: > First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to > gcc-patches. > > I don't have a fundamental objection to including this option, but > note that Richi, Honza and I have discovered that using AIX runtime > linking option interacts

Re: [PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-07 Thread David Edelsohn
First, please explicitly copy me on AIX or PowerPC patches sent to gcc-patches. I don't have a fundamental objection to including this option, but note that Richi, Honza and I have discovered that using AIX runtime linking option interacts badly with some GCC optimizations and can result in applic

[PATCH] AIX: Filename-based shared library versioning for libgcc_s

2014-11-07 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
Hi David (et al)! The upcoming initial release of gcc-5 feels like a good opportunity for the AIX port of gcc to introduce optional support for the important Linux-known feature I'd call "filename-based shared library versioning", aka. SONAME. We have had some discussion in https://gcc.gnu.org/PR