> On 17 Oct 2024, at 22:32, Victor Do Nascimento
> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I definitely agree about the spuriousness of the V2DI mode check.
> While I can't approve, I can confirm it looks good.
Thanks for looking at it Victor.
The patch is ok.
Kyrill
>
> Thanks,
> Victor.
>
> On 10/17/24 16:10,
FWIW, I definitely agree about the spuriousness of the V2DI mode check.
While I can't approve, I can confirm it looks good.
Thanks,
Victor.
On 10/17/24 16:10, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
The split condition in aarch64_simd_mov uses aarch64_simd_special_constant_p.
While
doing the split, it checks
The split condition in aarch64_simd_mov uses aarch64_simd_special_constant_p.
While
doing the split, it checks the mode before calling
aarch64_maybe_generate_simd_constant.
This risky since it may result in unexpectedly calling aarch64_split_simd_move
instead
of aarch64_maybe_generate_simd_con
