Thanks.
All the best,
Peixin
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 5:56 PM
To: qiaopeixin
Cc: Christophe Lyon ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
qiaopeixin writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the example.
>
> I remove the whole line "&&fndecl && TREE_PUBLIC (fndecl)" and passed
> bootstrap and deja tests. I add your provided example under
> /gcc.target/aarch64, and the patch is attached.
Thanks, pushed to master.
Richard
sts.
All the best,
Peixin
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 1:01 AM
To: qiaopeixin
Cc: Christophe Lyon ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
[PR96479]
qiaopeixin writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review and explanation.
>
> The previous fix adding if condition of TARGET_FLOAT does crash glibc-2.29.
>
> I checked the past log of writing the function aarch64_init_cumulative_args,
> and did not find the reason why Alan Lawrence added TREE_P
u have any suggestions on this fix?
>
> All the best,
> Peixin
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 8:19 PM
> To: Christophe Lyon
> Cc: qiaopeixin ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>
Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 8:19 PM
To: Christophe Lyon
Cc: qiaopeixin ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
[PR96479]
Christophe Lyon writes:
> On Thu, 1
;> Sent: 2020年8月13日 0:25
>> To: qiaopeixin
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
>> [PR96479]
>>
>> qiaopeixin writes:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The test case vector-subscr
patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
> [PR96479]
>
> qiaopeixin writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will report an ICE
> > in the expand pass since '-mgener
Thanks for the review and commit.
All the best,
Peixin
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
Sent: 2020年8月13日 0:25
To: qiaopeixin
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value
[PR96479
qiaopeixin writes:
> Hi,
>
> The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will report an ICE in
> the expand pass since '-mgeneral-regs-only' is incompatible with the use of
> V4SI mode. I propose to report the diagnostic information instead of ICE, and
> the problem has been discusse
PING this issue.
-邮件原件-
发件人: qiaopeixin
发送时间: 2020年8月6日 21:01
收件人: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org'
抄送: 'richard.sandif...@arm.com'
主题: [PATCH] AArch64: Add if condition in aarch64_function_value [PR96479]
Hi,
The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will r
Hi,
The test case vector-subscript-2.c in the gcc testsuit will report an ICE in
the expand pass since '-mgeneral-regs-only' is incompatible with the use of
V4SI mode. I propose to report the diagnostic information instead of ICE, and
the problem has been discussed on PR 96479.
I attached the
12 matches
Mail list logo