Hi!
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:31:30AM -0600, Li Jia He wrote:
> In order to fix PR92098, we need to define vec_cmp_* and vcond_mask_*. In
> fact,
> PR92132 already fixed the issue on the trunk. We need to backport PR92132 int
> part to gcc-9-branch.
(Part of that patch).
> 2019-11-27 Li Jia
On 2019/11/27 2:42 PM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi Lijia,
on 2019/11/27 下午2:31, Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
In order to fix PR92098, we need to define vec_cmp_* and vcond_mask_*. In fact,
PR92132 already fixed the issue on the trunk. We need to backport PR92132 int
part to gcc-9-branch. This patch back
Hi Lijia,
on 2019/11/27 下午2:31, Li Jia He wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to fix PR92098, we need to define vec_cmp_* and vcond_mask_*. In
> fact,
> PR92132 already fixed the issue on the trunk. We need to backport PR92132 int
> part to gcc-9-branch. This patch backport vector_{ungt,unge,unlt,unle}
Hi,
In order to fix PR92098, we need to define vec_cmp_* and vcond_mask_*. In fact,
PR92132 already fixed the issue on the trunk. We need to backport PR92132 int
part to gcc-9-branch. This patch backport vector_{ungt,unge,unlt,unle}
for vec_{cmp,cmpu} interface and related expand to gcc-9-branc
