On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 3:56 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:35:12PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > > On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > >>
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 06:35:12PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wro
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:58 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 3/18/19 6:35 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 0
On 3/18/19 6:35 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
>> Thanks, but I'm say
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 5:46 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> Thanks, but I'm saying that if you look at the code you can see t
On 3/18/19 5:07 PM, James Hilliard wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
Thanks, but I'm saying that if you look at the code you can see that
st is clearly initialized, by the call to lstat. I
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> > > Thanks, but I'm saying that if you look at the code you can see that
> > > st is clearly initialized, by the call to lstat. I would like to see
> > > an explanation for w
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 04:41:05PM -0600, James Hilliard wrote:
> > Thanks, but I'm saying that if you look at the code you can see that
> > st is clearly initialized, by the call to lstat. I would like to see
> > an explanation for why you are seeing that warning before changing the
> > code to d
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 2:05 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 AM James Hilliard
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:22 PM wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: James Hilliard
> > > >
> > > > Fixes er
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 AM James Hilliard
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:22 PM wrote:
> > >
> > > From: James Hilliard
> > >
> > > Fixes error: ‘st.st_mode’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > > ---
> > > l
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:19 AM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:22 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: James Hilliard
> >
> > Fixes error: ‘st.st_mode’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> > ---
> > libbacktrace/elf.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 6:22 PM wrote:
>
> From: James Hilliard
>
> Fixes error: ‘st.st_mode’ may be used uninitialized in this function
> ---
> libbacktrace/elf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/libbacktrace/elf.c b/libbacktrace/elf.c
> index f3988ec02a0
From: James Hilliard
Fixes error: ‘st.st_mode’ may be used uninitialized in this function
---
libbacktrace/elf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libbacktrace/elf.c b/libbacktrace/elf.c
index f3988ec02a0..714bfec965d 100644
--- a/libbacktrace/elf.c
+++ b/libbac
13 matches
Mail list logo