On Jul 11, 2024, David Malcolm wrote:
> I intended that particular test as an integration test, to try to make
> sure that -fanalyzer is silent on the result of a minimal "flex"
> script. So if we're actually getting warnings, that's undesirable, and
> I'm not sure the approach in your patch is
On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 10:36 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> The analyzer testsuite, on a customer's own operating system, reports
> a potential NULL pointer dereference in flex-without-call-
> summaries.c.
> I'm not sure why it shows up on that system, but not on others, but
> the test is not me
The analyzer testsuite, on a customer's own operating system, reports
a potential NULL pointer dereference in flex-without-call-summaries.c.
I'm not sure why it shows up on that system, but not on others, but
the test is not meant to test for that warning, so I'm silencing it.
Regstrapped on x86
