Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: c implies zca, and conditionally zcf & zcd

On 7/10/24 4:12 AM, Fei Gao wrote: According to Zc-1.0.4-3.pdf from https://github.com/riscvarchive/riscv-code-size-reduction/releases/tag/v1.0.4-3 The rule is that: - C always implies Zca - C+F implies Zcf (RV32 only) - C+D implies Zcd Signed-off-by: Fei Gao gcc/ChangeLog: * common

[PATCH] RISC-V: c implies zca, and conditionally zcf & zcd

According to Zc-1.0.4-3.pdf from https://github.com/riscvarchive/riscv-code-size-reduction/releases/tag/v1.0.4-3 The rule is that: - C always implies Zca - C+F implies Zcf (RV32 only) - C+D implies Zcd Signed-off-by: Fei Gao gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: c

Re: Re: [PATCH] [RISC-V] c implies zca, and conditionally zcf & zcd

On 2024-07-09 23:28  Jeff Law wrote: > > > >On 7/9/24 1:10 AM, Fei Gao wrote: >> According to Zc-1.0.4-3.pdf from >> https://github.com/riscvarchive/riscv-code-size-reduction/releases/tag/v1.0.4-3 >> The rule is that: >> - C always implies Zca >> - C+F implies Zcf (RV32 only) >> - C+D implies Zcd

Re: [PATCH] [RISC-V] c implies zca, and conditionally zcf & zcd

On 7/9/24 1:10 AM, Fei Gao wrote: According to Zc-1.0.4-3.pdf from https://github.com/riscvarchive/riscv-code-size-reduction/releases/tag/v1.0.4-3 The rule is that: - C always implies Zca - C+F implies Zcf (RV32 only) - C+D implies Zcd Signed-off-by: Fei Gao gcc/ChangeLog: * common

[PATCH] [RISC-V] c implies zca, and conditionally zcf & zcd

According to Zc-1.0.4-3.pdf from https://github.com/riscvarchive/riscv-code-size-reduction/releases/tag/v1.0.4-3 The rule is that: - C always implies Zca - C+F implies Zcf (RV32 only) - C+D implies Zcd Signed-off-by: Fei Gao gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: