On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:49 AM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 09:11:12AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:36 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 09:11:12AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:36 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:20 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:36 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:20 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:29:11PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 08:55:57AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:20 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:29:11PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rich
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 4:20 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:29:11PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Richard Biener writes:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Richard Sandiford
>
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:29:11PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > Richard Biener writes:
> > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > >> > On Wed
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:45 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> >> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:18 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
> >> > Gcc-patches wrot
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
>> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:18 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
>> > Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discu
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:09 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:18 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
> > Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>
> >> This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discussion
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pip
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:18 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
> Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>> This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discussion
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/549132.html
>>
>> In case that an alignment
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:18 PM Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via
Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discussion
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/549132.html
>
> In case that an alignment constraint is less than the size of a
> correspon
Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc-patches writes:
> This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discussion
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/549132.html
>
> In case that an alignment constraint is less than the size of a
> corresponding scalar type, ensure that we
This is a follow up to commit 5c9669a0e6c respectively discussion
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-June/549132.html
In case that an alignment constraint is less than the size of a
corresponding scalar type, ensure that we advance at least by one
iteration. For example, on s390x we h
13 matches
Mail list logo