On 04/15/2015 03:13 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Xingxing Pan wrote:
Hi,
The expanding of widen-sum pattern always fails. The vectorizer expects the
operands to have the same size, while the current implementation of
widen-sum pattern dose not conform to this
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Xingxing Pan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The expanding of widen-sum pattern always fails. The vectorizer expects the
> operands to have the same size, while the current implementation of
> widen-sum pattern dose not conform to this.
>
> This patch implements the widen-sum patt
Hi Xingxing,
I'm a little confused by your reasons for adding testcases marked XFAIL.
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:34:25PM +, Xingxing Pan wrote:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "pattern recognized.*w\\\+" 1 "vect" {
> xfail *-*-* } } } */
> +/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "vect" }
On 05/03/15 13:34, Xingxing Pan wrote:
Hi,
Hi Xingxing,
Thanks for improving this! Some comments inline.
The expanding of widen-sum pattern always fails. The vectorizer expects
the operands to have the same size, while the current implementation of
widen-sum pattern dose not conform to this.
Hi,
The expanding of widen-sum pattern always fails. The vectorizer expects
the operands to have the same size, while the current implementation of
widen-sum pattern dose not conform to this.
This patch implements the widen-sum pattern with vpadal. Change the
vaddw pattern to anonymous. Add
