apinski--- via Gcc-patches writes:
> From: Andrew Pinski
>
> So the problem is even though there was a csneg with
> a zero_extend in the front, there was not one for csinv.
> This fixes it by extending that pattern.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
>
> gcc
From: Andrew Pinski
So the problem is even though there was a csneg with
a zero_extend in the front, there was not one for csinv.
This fixes it by extending that pattern.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/101205
* con
From: Andrew Pinski
So the problem is even though there was a csneg with
a zero_extend in the front, there was not one for csinv.
This fixes it by extending that pattern.
OK? Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/101205
* con
