On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 07:53:23PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > Okay for gcc trunk?
>
> Ok, applied. I updated the wording of the checkin slightly, hope you don't
> mind. Thanks. Hate to find out late in the game, but, at least we figured
> i
On Mar 13, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Okay for gcc trunk?
Ok, applied. I updated the wording of the checkin slightly, hope you don't
mind. Thanks. Hate to find out late in the game, but, at least we figured it
out before release.
2011-03-13 Jack Howarth
PR lto/48086
Unfortunately, Apple's assembler programmers overzealously fixed
radar://7920267 by ignoring their own mach-o specifications and blindly
forcing 255 sections regardless of the presence of symbols. This causes
major breakage in the LTO testsuite...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/m
