在 2022/7/28 下午6:41, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 10:59 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
The ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT macro before and after modification
is
as follows:
#define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE, GLOBAL) \
- (((GLOBAL) ? DW_EH_PE_indirect : 0) | DW_EH_PE_absptr)
+ (
On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 10:59 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> > The ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT macro before and after modification
> > is
> as follows:
> #define ASM_PREFERRED_EH_DATA_FORMAT(CODE, GLOBAL) \
> - (((GLOBAL) ? DW_EH_PE_indirect : 0) | DW_EH_PE_absptr)
> + (((GLOBAL) ? DW_EH_PE_indire
在 2022/7/26 下午8:01, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 19:42 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
在 2022/7/26 下午5:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
Should we indicate that our .eh_frame section format has changed?
I don't really understand C++ exception handling, so: does the change
breaks something? For example, if
在 2022/7/26 下午8:01, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 19:42 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
在 2022/7/26 下午5:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
+ whether the la.* macro instructions will be generated when
+ loading symbolic addresses.
+ This feature requires binutils version 2.40 or later. If you want to use th
在 2022/7/26 下午7:32, Gerald Pfeifer 写道:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Lulu Cheng wrote:
+LoongArch
+
+ The option -mexplicit-relocs has been added, this indicates
+ whether the la.* macro instructions will be generated when
+ loading symbolic addresses.
How about making this "...has been added. It i
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 19:42 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> 在 2022/7/26 下午5:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> >
> > > + whether the la.* macro instructions will be generated when
> > > + loading symbolic addresses.
> > > + This feature requires binutils version 2.40 or later. If you want to
> > > use the
> > >
在 2022/7/26 下午5:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
+ whether the la.* macro instructions will be generated when
+ loading symbolic addresses.
+ This feature requires binutils version 2.40 or later. If you want to use the
+ older version of bintuils, add compiler parameters
+ -mno-explicit-relocs at compi
On Tue, 26 Jul 2022, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> +LoongArch
> +
> + The option -mexplicit-relocs has been added, this
> indicates
> + whether the la.* macro instructions will be generated when
> + loading symbolic addresses.
How about making this "...has been added. It indicates..." or, if you
prefer
+Xuerui (his English is much better than mine).
On Tue, 2022-07-26 at 15:21 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently we added split symbol support, changed in r13-1834.
> It is ok for wwwdocs?
> +LoongArch
> +
> + The option -mexplicit-relocs has been added, this indicate
I think "added an
Hi,
Recently we added split symbol support, changed in r13-1834.
It is ok for wwwdocs?
Thanks!
Lulu Cheng
---
htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html | 21 +
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html
index 57bd8724..60399e4e
10 matches
Mail list logo
