Re: [PATCH][tree-inline][obvious] Delete redundant count_insns_seq

On 09/23/2015 10:05 AM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, I notice that the functions count_insns_seq and estimate_num_insns_seq perform the exact same function for exactly the same arguments. It's redundant to keep both around. I've decided to delete count_insns_seq and replace its one use by estim

[PATCH][tree-inline][obvious] Delete redundant count_insns_seq

Hi all, I notice that the functions count_insns_seq and estimate_num_insns_seq perform the exact same function for exactly the same arguments. It's redundant to keep both around. I've decided to delete count_insns_seq and replace its one use by estimate_num_insns_seq. Bootstrapped and tested o