On Tue, 13 Aug 2019, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > From: Richard Biener
> > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:50:34 +0200
>
> > 2019-08-13 Richard Biener
> >
> > PR testsuite/91419
> > * lib/target-supports.exp (natural_alignment_32): Amend target
> > list based on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT.
> >
> From: Richard Biener
> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 09:50:34 +0200
> 2019-08-13 Richard Biener
>
> PR testsuite/91419
> * lib/target-supports.exp (natural_alignment_32): Amend target
> list based on BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT.
> (natural_alignment_64): Targets not natural_alignment
The following fixes the observed regressions for targets not
naturally aligning 'int'. I've figured we have natural_alignment_32
whose incomplete target list I amended by looking for BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT
less than 32 (and for m68k-*-linux* asking the maintainer).
Tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
