On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As Alexander pointed out in the thread starting at [1] the sort_by_bitpos
> sorting function
> was behaving badly when we had multiple stores at the same position. He
> fixed that (thanks!)
> but we can do better by not returni
Hi all,
As Alexander pointed out in the thread starting at [1] the
sort_by_bitpos sorting function
was behaving badly when we had multiple stores at the same position. He
fixed that (thanks!)
but we can do better by not returning zero when the bitpositions are
equal but by falling back
to com
