Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-10-05 Thread Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > I've had to modify this patch in two ways: > - the original test-case stopped failing, though not the > minimized one, so I added that one as a test-case > - only testing for ENTER_ALLOC and EXIT, and not explicitly for VOTE_ANY > in ignore_bb_p also s

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-10-05 Thread Tom de Vries
On 9/24/20 2:44 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> On 9/24/20 1:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> On 9/23/20 9:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> [ was: Re:

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-10-05 Thread Tom de Vries
On 9/22/20 6:38 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB > with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] > > On 9/16/20 8:20 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: >> >>> [ cc-ing author omp support for nvptx. ] >> >> The i

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 9/24/20 1:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > > > >> On 9/23/20 9:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > >>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >>> > [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Do

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-24 Thread Tom de Vries
On 9/24/20 1:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> On 9/23/20 9:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] O

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, 23 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 9/23/20 9:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > > > >> [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB > >> with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] > >> > >> On 9/16/20 8:20 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: >

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-23 Thread Tom de Vries
On 9/23/20 9:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB >> with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] >> >> On 9/16/20 8:20 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> >

Re: [PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > [ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB > with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] > > On 9/16/20 8:20 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > > > >> [ cc-ing author omp support for nvptx. ] >

[PATCH][omp, ftracer] Don't duplicate blocks in SIMT region

2020-09-22 Thread Tom de Vries
[ was: Re: [Patch] [middle-end & nvptx] gcc/tracer.c: Don't split BB with SIMT LANE [PR95654] ] On 9/16/20 8:20 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Tom de Vries wrote: > >> [ cc-ing author omp support for nvptx. ] > > The issue looks familiar. I recognized it back in 2017 (