On 09/26/2014 06:54 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
It also uncovers that the C++ FE uses a mix of NOP_EXPR and
CONVERT_EXPR both when building expressions and when checking
for them. Jason - is there any difference between NOP_EXPR and
CONVERT_EXPR as far as the C++ FE is concerned?
There are a few
This fixes a ??? and handles NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR matching
similar to GIMPLE by using CASE_CONVERT. This uncovers a
mismatch between fold-const.c and tree-ssa-forwprop.c transforms
which try to do opposite things with ((T) X) & CST vs.
(T) (X & CST). I have disabled the forwprop transform o
