On 6 May 2015 at 09:27, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>
> On 22/04/15 13:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 22 April 2015 at 12:25, Renlin Li wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jonathan,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the suggestion. I have just attached the updated the patch.
>>> It
>>> works as before.
>>> Is this Ok
Hi Jonathan,
On 22/04/15 13:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22 April 2015 at 12:25, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have just attached the updated the patch. It
works as before.
Is this Okay to commit?
OK, thanks.
Is it Okay for me to backport this patch to bran
On 22 April 2015 at 12:25, Renlin Li wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. I have just attached the updated the patch. It
> works as before.
> Is this Okay to commit?
OK, thanks.
Hi Jonathan,
Thank you for the suggestion. I have just attached the updated the
patch. It works as before.
Is this Okay to commit?
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 22/04/15 11:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/04/15 15:29 +0100, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This patch defines a new dg-require-thread-fence
On 21/04/15 15:29 +0100, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This patch defines a new dg-require-thread-fence directive. And three
test cases are updated to use it.
The new directive are used to check whether the target support thread
fence either by the target back-end or external library function cal
Hi all,
This patch defines a new dg-require-thread-fence directive. And three
test cases are updated to use it.
The new directive are used to check whether the target support thread
fence either by the target back-end or external library function call. A
thread fence is required to expand at
