Hi!
On 2022-02-24T11:32:53+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> the sm_30 test which is still dg-do run (although I've
> added the compile time test) which should pass on all boards (since we
> don't support below sm_30).
Pushed to master branch commit 95e6e32a85566a5510d21938d439e90e504
Hi!
On 2022-02-24T11:32:53+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-sm30.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/* { dg-do run { target { offload_target_nvptx } } } */
This means, the test case is active if nvptx offloading compilation is
e
Hi!
On 2022-02-24T11:32:53+0100, Tom de Vries via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> [libgomp, testsuite, nvptx] Add libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-sm*.c
\o/ Yay for test cases!
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-sm30.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> +/* { dg-do run { target { offload_t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:32:53AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> libgomp/ChangeLog:
>
> 2022-02-24 Tom de Vries
>
> * testsuite/libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-sm30.c: New test.
> * testsuite/libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-sm35.c: New test.
> * testsuite/libgomp.c/declare-variant-3-s
On 2/24/22 11:09, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:01:22AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
[ was: Re: [Patch] nvptx: Add -mptx=6.0 + -misa=sm_70 ]
On 2/24/22 09:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
I'll try to submit a patch with one or more test-cases.
Hi,
These test-cases exercise the omp de
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:01:22AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [Patch] nvptx: Add -mptx=6.0 + -misa=sm_70 ]
>
> On 2/24/22 09:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > I'll try to submit a patch with one or more test-cases.
>
> Hi,
>
> These test-cases exercise the omp declare variant construct us
[ was: Re: [Patch] nvptx: Add -mptx=6.0 + -misa=sm_70 ]
On 2/24/22 09:29, Tom de Vries wrote:
I'll try to submit a patch with one or more test-cases.
Hi,
These test-cases exercise the omp declare variant construct using the
available nvptx isas.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
- Tom[libgomp, testsu