On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> This is the last (planned) bit for the regular type merging machinery
>> (there is still some issues with TYPE_CANONICAL that I will try to
>> address next). It avoids merging types w
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This is the last (planned) bit for the regular type merging machinery
> (there is still some issues with TYPE_CANONICAL that I will try to
> address next). It avoids merging types which have different names
> as that leads to interestin
This is the last (planned) bit for the regular type merging machinery
(there is still some issues with TYPE_CANONICAL that I will try to
address next). It avoids merging types which have different names
as that leads to interesting debuginfo issues.
LTO-bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-
