On December 8, 2017 5:45:23 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On December 8, 2017 4:51:16 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka
> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This restores the vec_construct cost dependence on the vector
>element
>> >> count. Honza removed this (accidentially?) during the rework.
>> >>
>> >> Boots
> On December 8, 2017 4:51:16 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >>
> >> This restores the vec_construct cost dependence on the vector element
> >> count. Honza removed this (accidentially?) during the rework.
> >>
> >> Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for
> >trunk?
>
On December 8, 2017 4:51:16 PM GMT+01:00, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> This restores the vec_construct cost dependence on the vector element
>> count. Honza removed this (accidentially?) during the rework.
>>
>> Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for
>trunk?
>
>Hmm, the fal
>
> This restores the vec_construct cost dependence on the vector element
> count. Honza removed this (accidentially?) during the rework.
>
> Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
Hmm, the false parameter to ix86_vec_cost is supposed to do that. It uses:
if (!
This restores the vec_construct cost dependence on the vector element
count. Honza removed this (accidentially?) during the rework.
Bootstrap / regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.
2017-12-08 Richard Biener
PR target/83008
* config/i38
