And now another PR was opened (120887). so perhaps I should apply it.
If I don't hear a dissenting opinion, I'll Apply it monday PM to GCC 13.
It is completely self contained to uses of complex ASSUME's as Jakub
suggests it is...
Andrew
On 3/28/25 05:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 2
On 3/28/25 05:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:14 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
This patch backports the ASSUME support that was rewritten in GCC 15.
Its slightly more complicated than the port to GCC 14 was in that
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 08:12:35AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:14 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >
> > This patch backports the ASSUME support that was rewritten in GCC 15.
> >
> > Its slightly more complicated than the port to GCC 14 was in that a few
> > classes have bee
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 8:14 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> This patch backports the ASSUME support that was rewritten in GCC 15.
>
> Its slightly more complicated than the port to GCC 14 was in that a few
> classes have been rewritten. I've isolated them all to tree-assume.cc
> which contains the p
This patch backports the ASSUME support that was rewritten in GCC 15.
Its slightly more complicated than the port to GCC 14 was in that a few
classes have been rewritten. I've isolated them all to tree-assume.cc
which contains the pass.
It has to also bring in the ssa_cache and lazy_ssa_cache
